On 11/22/2016 11:58 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:53:50AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> I've incorporated those changes in this patch. Is it ok for trunk?
>
> The ChangeLog mentions omp-low.[ch] changes, but the patch doesn't include
> them.
> Have they been dropped, o
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:53:50AM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> I've incorporated those changes in this patch. Is it ok for trunk?
The ChangeLog mentions omp-low.[ch] changes, but the patch doesn't include
them.
Have they been dropped, or moved to another patch?
> 2016-11-22 Cesar Philippid
On 11/18/2016 04:14 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:43:02PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>> +error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
>> + "%qs specifies a conflicting level of parallelism",
>> + omp_clause_code_name[OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (c)])
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:43:02PM -0800, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> + error_at (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c),
> + "%qs specifies a conflicting level of parallelism",
> + omp_clause_code_name[OMP_CLAUSE_CODE (c)]);
> + inform (OMP_CLAUSE_LOCATION (c_le
