On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think that would be the most clean solution - unfortunately
> > the current setup of the toplevel hierarchy does not support this
> > (easily, at least). A way out would be to always claim stuf
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Yes, I think that would be the most clean solution - unfortunately
> the current setup of the toplevel hierarchy does not support this
> (easily, at least). A way out would be to always claim stuff is
> installed - thus, use the =system variants and a
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > >
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > >
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello.
> > > >
> > > > Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have f
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> >
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have failed.
> >
> > Which ISL patch ?
> >
> > > I am building with l
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> > Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have failed.
>
> Which ISL patch ?
>
> > I am building with local copies of all the libraries, so I have added
> > gmp, mpfr, mpc,
On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have failed.
Which ISL patch ?
> I am building with local copies of all the libraries, so I have added
> gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl and cloog from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure
> to
Hello.
Ever since the ISL patch went in my builds have failed.
I am building with local copies of all the libraries, so I have added
gmp, mpfr, mpc, isl and cloog from ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure
to my source directory.
The command sequence I use is
svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
On Jul 4, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On We
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >>>
>
> O
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>
On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On W
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >>>
>
> O
On Jul 4, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>>>
On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Th
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >>>
> On 12-06-27
On Jul 4, 2012, at 10:58 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
>>>
On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> 2012-06-27 Richard G
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >
> >> On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
> >>> Michael Matz
> >>> Tobias Grosser
> >>>
On Jul 2, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
>> On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
>>> Michael Matz
>>> Tobias Grosser
>>> Sebastian Pop
>>>
>>> config/
>>> * cloog.m4: S
> > Hi Tobi and Andrew,
> >
> > Thanks for your timely answers. I just saw Sebastian's comments:
> >
> > Yes, having GCC only depend on ISL and CLooG-ISL (and not depend
> > anymore on PPL) is our plan for 4.7.
> >
> > from http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-08/msg01161.html.
>
> Yes but thos
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; tob...@grosser.es;
>> seb...@gmail.com; Michael Matz; Diego Novillo; Joey Ye
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move Graphite from using PPL over to ISL
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Terry Guo wrote:
>> > Hi Richard,
>> >
>> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Guo [mailto:terry@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 15:12
> To: 'Andrew Pinski'; tob...@grosser.es
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Joey Ye
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] Move Graphite from using PPL over to ISL
>
iego Novillo; Joey Ye
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move Graphite from using PPL over to ISL
>
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Terry Guo wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > What's the plan for 4.7 branch? Will you back port this patch to 4.7
> and
> > make it use ISL
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Terry Guo wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> What's the plan for 4.7 branch? Will you back port this patch to 4.7 and
> make it use ISL too? I am going to create a upstream GCC SVN branch from 4.7
> for development on ARM embedded processors. If there will be some big
> chan
On 07/04/2012 08:51 AM, Terry Guo wrote:
Hi Richard,
What's the plan for 4.7 branch? Will you back port this patch to 4.7 and
make it use ISL too? I am going to create a upstream GCC SVN branch from 4.7
for development on ARM embedded processors. If there will be some big
changes for 4.7 in near
Hi Richard,
What's the plan for 4.7 branch? Will you back port this patch to 4.7 and
make it use ISL too? I am going to create a upstream GCC SVN branch from 4.7
for development on ARM embedded processors. If there will be some big
changes for 4.7 in near future in terms of replacing PPL with ISL,
I updated my trunk and was able to build. No problems at all.
Thank you.
Nenad
On 7/3/2012 3:12 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guent
I'll try again.
On the other hand I am pretty sure that I have ISL unpacked in my source
tree.
lrwxrwxrwx 1 nenad users 8 Jul 2 10:58 isl -> isl-0.10
drwxrwsr-x 7 nenad users4096 Jun 4 09:40 isl-0.10
Thank you.
On 7/3/2012 3:12 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
The following fixes th
On 07/03/2012 12:12 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Ric
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > > This merges from the graphite br
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> >
> > > On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > This merges from the graphite branch the move of PPL to ISL,
> > > > and completes it where i
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
>
> > On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > This merges from the graphite branch the move of PPL to ISL,
> > > and completes it where it was lacking - thanks to Micha.
> > > It leaves unmerged t
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Nenad Vukicevic wrote:
> On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > This merges from the graphite branch the move of PPL to ISL,
> > and completes it where it was lacking - thanks to Micha.
> > It leaves unmerged the addition of a pluto-like ISL optimizer
> > as well as
On 6/27/2012 8:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This merges from the graphite branch the move of PPL to ISL,
and completes it where it was lacking - thanks to Micha.
It leaves unmerged the addition of a pluto-like ISL optimizer
as well as a bugfix for stride > 1 which did not come with
a testcase.
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:37:20AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> >
> > > On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
> > > > Michae
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 01:43:56PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
>
> > On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
> > > Michael Matz
> > > Tobias Grosser
> > > Sebastian Pop
> > >
> > > config/
> >
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > 2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
> > Michael Matz
> > Tobias Grosser
> > Sebastian Pop
> >
> > config/
> > * cloog.m4: Set up to work against ISL only.
> > * isl.m4: New file.
On 12-06-27 11:06 , Richard Guenther wrote:
2012-06-27 Richard Guenther
Michael Matz
Tobias Grosser
Sebastian Pop
config/
* cloog.m4: Set up to work against ISL only.
* isl.m4: New file.
* Makefile.def: Add ISL host module, remove
On 06/27/2012 05:06 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
This merges from the graphite branch the move of PPL to ISL,
and completes it where it was lacking - thanks to Micha.
It leaves unmerged the addition of a pluto-like ISL optimizer
as well as a bugfix for stride> 1 which did not come with
a testcas
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> With this patch (ontop of the one requiring ClooG 0.17.0)
> we will require ISL 0.10 for enabling Graphite.
Thanks Richi, Micha, and Tobi for picking up this code and making this
transition happen. I owe each of you a beer ;-)
Sebastia
42 matches
Mail list logo