On Tue, Aug 05, 2014 at 05:02:57PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 10:07 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:44 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
> > > that it's become much more difficu
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 10:07 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:44 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
> > that it's become much more difficult to set breakpoints on the execute
> > hooks of a pass, now that the
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:44 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
> that it's become much more difficult to set breakpoints on the execute
> hooks of a pass, now that the passes are classes within anonymous
> namespaces.
>
> When this w
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:44:29PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
> that it's become much more difficult to set breakpoints on the execute
> hooks of a pass, now that the passes are classes within anonymous
> namespaces.
Well, i
On Tue, 2014-07-29 at 16:44 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> A complaint I heard at Cauldron with the C++ification of GCC passes is
> that it's become much more difficult to set breakpoints on the execute
> hooks of a pass, now that the passes are classes within anonymous
> namespaces.
>
> When this
