On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Mike Stump wrote:
> > BTW, do you happen to know a way to reliable force all our testsuites NOT
> > to delete executables after run? Personally I think it's missing the
> > point to have them deleted -- how can one debug any regressions then?
>
> So, I go into the source a
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > I checked with one of the AVP engineers and he said:
> >
> > "madd/msub/nmadd/nmsub.fmt instructions are required for all release 2
> > implementations,
> > whether or not that implementation has a 64 bit fpu. They are also
> > required for mips64
Steve Ellcey writes:
> From: Maciej W. Rozycki [ma...@codesourcery.com]
>
>> Steve, would you therefore please do us a favour and check what the AVP
>> for MIPS32r2 requires for support of the floating-point MADD instruction
>> subset, or preferably, the whole COP1X instruction set? Are these
>>
From: Maciej W. Rozycki [ma...@codesourcery.com]
> Steve, would you therefore please do us a favour and check what the AVP
> for MIPS32r2 requires for support of the floating-point MADD instruction
> subset, or preferably, the whole COP1X instruction set? Are these
> instructions only mandatory
>> What do other people do?
>
> We usually can cut and paste the one line and run the one case by hand. Test
> cases that don't fall into this category, well, suck, I mean, are more
> annoying.
>
These days I find contrib/repro_fail
file.log.useful to rebuild the failing test(s).
regards
Rama
On Feb 20, 2013, at 3:50 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> BTW, do you happen to know a way to reliable force all our testsuites NOT
> to delete executables after run? Personally I think it's missing the
> point to have them deleted -- how can one debug any regressions then?
So, I go into the sou
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > This issue was originally raised here:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00863.html
> >
> > We have a shortcoming in GCC in that we only allow the use half of the FP
> > MADD instruction subset (MADD.fmt and MSUB.fmt) in the 6
"Maciej W. Rozycki" writes:
> This issue was originally raised here:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-12/msg00863.html
>
> We have a shortcoming in GCC in that we only allow the use half of the FP
> MADD instruction subset (MADD.fmt and MSUB.fmt) in the 64-bit/32-register
> mode (CP0
