On 05/19/2017 04:41 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
We used to have fixed size cyclic buffer for those strings, so it was safe
to invoke name/asm_name few times and still expect the result to be there.
I wonder what happened to those? Using ggc is bit ugly here, but I suppose
it is OK for debug output...
> Hello.
>
> We repeat all over following patterns:
>
> fprintf (dump_file, "Removing speculative call %s/%i => %s/%i\n",
> xstrdup_for_dump (edge->caller->name ()),
> edge->caller->order,
> xstrdup_for_dump (e2->callee->n
