On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 10:51:10PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > This breaks bootstrap on Solaris with nawk:
> >
> > nawk -f /homes/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/gen-pass-instances.awk \
> > /homes/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/passes.def > pass-instances.def
> > nawk: you can only delete arr
> This breaks bootstrap on Solaris with nawk:
>
> nawk -f /homes/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/gen-pass-instances.awk \
> /homes/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/passes.def > pass-instances.def
> nawk: you can only delete array[element] at source line 196
> context is
> delete >>> pass
> Here is updated patch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
> i686-linux. I'll still wait a few days before committing to see if somebody
> likes to comment on the awk implementation of the script.
>
> 2016-10-05 Jakub Jelinek
>
> * gen-pass-instances.awk: Rewritten.
This break
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 04:54:34PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Typo in the comment: duplicated 'after'.
>
> Will fix.
...
Here is updated patch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux. I'll still wait a few days before committing to see if somebody
likes to comment on the awk
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 05:48:15PM +0300, Alexander Monakov wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This patch allows backends to provide their *-passes.def file with
> > instructions how to ammend passes.def, which then can be inspected in
> > pass-instances.def the script generates
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> This patch allows backends to provide their *-passes.def file with
> instructions how to ammend passes.def, which then can be inspected in
> pass-instances.def the script generates.
A few minor comments:
> --- gcc/gen-pass-instances.awk.jj 2016-09-2
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> As discussed earlier on IRC, the current way of registering target specific
>> passes has various issues:
>> 1) for -da, the target specific dump files appear last, regardless on where
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed earlier on IRC, the current way of registering target specific
> passes has various issues:
> 1) for -da, the target specific dump files appear last, regardless on where
>exactly they appear in the pass queue, so one has to look
