Re: [PATCH] Improve simplify_subreg

2013-05-04 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jakub Jelinek writes: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Jakub Jelinek writes: >> > When working on PR57130, I've wondered why we don't simplify it much >> > earlier >> > and end up with creating such weirdness. >> > >> > The following patch fixes that, by us

Re: [PATCH] Improve simplify_subreg

2013-05-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Jakub Jelinek writes: > > When working on PR57130, I've wondered why we don't simplify it much earlier > > and end up with creating such weirdness. > > > > The following patch fixes that, by using nonzero_bits to see if all the l

Re: [PATCH] Improve simplify_subreg

2013-05-02 Thread Richard Sandiford
Jakub Jelinek writes: > Hi! > > When working on PR57130, I've wondered why we don't simplify it much earlier > and end up with creating such weirdness. > > The following patch fixes that, by using nonzero_bits to see if all the low > bits must be zero and in that case just return zero. > > Bootstr