On 11/17/2017 05:40 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 16/11/17 09:18 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 11/16/2017 03:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some iss
On 16/11/17 09:18 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/16/2017 03:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
- That first sentence is looong.
- Apparently some C
On 16/11/17 10:59 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
On 11/16/2017 03:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
- That first sentence is looong.
- Apparently some C++ p
On 11/16/2017 03:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
>>>
>>> - That first sentence is looong.
>>> - Apparently some C++ programmers think "automati
On 11/16/2017 03:49 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
- That first sentence is looong.
- Apparently some C++ programmers think "automatic variable" mean
On 15/11/17 20:28 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
- That first sentence is looong.
- Apparently some C++ programmers think "automatic variable" means one
declared with C++11 `auto`, rather than si
On 11/15/2017 07:31 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
The docs for -Wmaybe-uninitialized have some issues:
- That first sentence is looong.
- Apparently some C++ programmers think "automatic variable" means one
declared with C++11 `auto`, rather than simply a local variable.
- The sentence about o
