On Tue, 21 Apr 2020, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Hi Hans,
Hi Gus,
> On 4/14/20 12:33 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Sadly this patch doesn't fix PR bootstrap/87252; I just checked
> > against f8e72b8d9f2:f81653ba8c1:2dd4ceacd8b (truncated from
> > LAST_UPDATED; I don't remember which field is the
Hi Hans,
On 4/14/20 12:33 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
Sadly this patch doesn't fix PR bootstrap/87252; I just checked
against f8e72b8d9f2:f81653ba8c1:2dd4ceacd8b (truncated from
LAST_UPDATED; I don't remember which field is the actual
commit).
So, would you mind to tell me precisely how to r
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Gustavo Romero via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Currently an use of get() method of dump_context singleton in optinfo
> framework causes a new class to be instantiated, which calls the singleton
> dtor when the class is destroyed, freeing memory that is referenced after
> free() is cal
Hi,
since there has been some misunderstanding, I will explain.
There are 4 possible options here:
1. FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE, powerpc, GCC 4.2
2. FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT (head branch), powerpc, LLVM 10.0.0
3. FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE, powerpc64, GCC 4.2
4. FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT (head branch), powerpc64, L
On 04/07/2020 03:24 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:42:17PM -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote:
2020-04-06 Gustavo Romero
* dumpfile.c:
(selftest::temp_dump_context::temp_dump_context): Fix ctor.
---
gcc/dumpfile.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 inse
Hi David,
On 04/06/2020 10:42 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 19:44 -0400, Gustavo Romero wrote:
Thanks for this patch.
The patch looks correct, but I'm not sure that the description of the
problem is exact in every detail. I think you've run into a bug in
code I wrote; sorry.
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:42:17PM -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > 2020-04-06 Gustavo Romero
> >
> > * dumpfile.c:
> > (selftest::temp_dump_context::temp_dump_context): Fix ctor.
> > ---
> > gcc/dumpfile.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 21:42 -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 19:44 -0400, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>
> Thanks for this patch.
>
> The patch looks correct, but I'm not sure that the description of the
> problem is exact in every detail. I think you've run into a bu
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 19:44 -0400, Gustavo Romero wrote:
Thanks for this patch.
The patch looks correct, but I'm not sure that the description of the
problem is exact in every detail. I think you've run into a bug in
code I wrote; sorry.
> Currently an use of get() method of dump_context single
