> Agreed, please install this patch if you haven't already.
Thanks, done after successfully bootstrapping on SPARC64/Linux.
--
Eric Botcazou
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:31:53 +0200
>> If one wants a 32-bit default compiler, they should build for the
>> sparc-linux target. And this is absolutely trivial to make happen
>> in the environments where this is supposedly a problem.
>
> I have criticized so many times this
> If one wants a 32-bit default compiler, they should build for the
> sparc-linux target. And this is absolutely trivial to make happen
> in the environments where this is supposedly a problem.
I have criticized so many times this combination in the past, while Jakub and
also you IIRC were defen
From: Eric Botcazou
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:27:03 +0200
>> If you configure a biarch Linux/Sparc compiler defaulting to
>> 32-bit, but give --with-cpu= for a v9 cpu it erroneously
>> turns on 64-bit in TARGET_DEFAULT.
>
> PR target/50354 reports the breakage of the opposite case after the chan
> If you configure a biarch Linux/Sparc compiler defaulting to
> 32-bit, but give --with-cpu= for a v9 cpu it erroneously
> turns on 64-bit in TARGET_DEFAULT.
PR target/50354 reports the breakage of the opposite case after the change:
configuring for sparc64-linux --with-cpu=v8 used to build a 32-
