On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 07:45:23AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >Indeed, GCC 3.4 warns about this:
> >pr70405-3.c:7: warning: suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous
> >`else'
> >That warning is still in there under -Wparentheses, but doesn't trigger
> >anymore.
>
> Sounds like poor testsuite
On March 29, 2016 7:54:16 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:46:32PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> On 03/29/2016 07:28 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> >On 03/29/2016 11:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >>Hi!
>> >>
>> >>The recent change to num_imm_uses (to add support for NULL
>U
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 07:46:32PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 07:28 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> >On 03/29/2016 11:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>Hi!
> >>
> >>The recent change to num_imm_uses (to add support for NULL USE_STMT)
> >>broke it totally, fortunately we have just one user of t
On 03/29/2016 07:28 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/29/2016 11:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The recent change to num_imm_uses (to add support for NULL USE_STMT)
broke it totally, fortunately we have just one user of this function
right now. I've filed a PR for GCC 7 so that we get a warning on th
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:28:20AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 03/29/2016 11:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >The recent change to num_imm_uses (to add support for NULL USE_STMT)
> >broke it totally, fortunately we have just one user of this function
> >right now. I've filed a PR for GCC 7 so that w
On 03/29/2016 11:23 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The recent change to num_imm_uses (to add support for NULL USE_STMT)
broke it totally, fortunately we have just one user of this function
right now. I've filed a PR for GCC 7 so that we get a warning on this.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested
