On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:16:32AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> > Ah, I see. Could you change the comment then, to say what we are
> > really testing?
>
> Sure. Updated as follows. Committed to mainline.
Thanks!
Segher
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Segher Boessenkool
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > The new split-1.c testcase fails on targets that do not support split
>> > stack (like 32-bit P
>
> [ Paul Hua sent a patch adding split_stack already, it was OKed, but
> it is not committed yet, fwiw ].
>
I saw this, so not commit my patch.
Paul.
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 07:38:04PM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Segher Boessenkool
> wrote:
> >
> > The new split-1.c testcase fails on targets that do not support split
> > stack (like 32-bit PowerPC Linux). This patch fixes it by only running
> > the testcas
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Segher Boessenkool
wrote:
>
> The new split-1.c testcase fails on targets that do not support split
> stack (like 32-bit PowerPC Linux). This patch fixes it by only running
> the testcase if split stack is supported. It also adds the reorder
> flag to the options
