On Fri, 2015-05-22 at 17:41 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> On 21/05/15 19:26, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> >> On 19/05/15 20:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:36 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 1
On 21/05/15 19:26, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
On 19/05/15 20:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:36 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Hello,
On 15/05/15 17:22, Torvald Riegel wrote:
This patch improves the documentation of the built
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 16:45 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> On 19/05/15 20:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:36 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On 15/05/15 17:22, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> >>> This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
> >>>
On 19/05/15 20:20, Torvald Riegel wrote:
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:36 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
Hello,
On 15/05/15 17:22, Torvald Riegel wrote:
This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
operations.
The "memory model" to "memory order" change does improve things but I
On Mon, 2015-05-18 at 17:36 +0100, Matthew Wahab wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 15/05/15 17:22, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> > This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
> > operations.
>
> The "memory model" to "memory order" change does improve things but I think
> that
> the patch h
On 05/15/2015 10:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
operations.
First, to be consistent with the C++11 standard and make it easier for
users to relate the built-ins to the C++11 specification, the patch
changes 'memory model' to 'memory
Hello,
On 15/05/15 17:22, Torvald Riegel wrote:
This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
operations.
The "memory model" to "memory order" change does improve things but I think that
the patch has some problems. As it is now, it makes some of the descriptions
quite diff