Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread JonY
On 8/4/2012 13:24, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the ChangeLog is good. >>

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:36 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: > > OK. Btw, I don'

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread JonY
On 8/4/2012 13:14, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: >>> >>> OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the >>> ChangeLog is good. >>> >>> 2012-08-03 Jonathan Yong >>> >>> * Makefi

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:24 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the Change

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:14 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: >>> >>> OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the >>> ChangeLog is good. >>> >>> 2012-08-03 Jonathan Yong >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread H.J. Lu
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: >> >> OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the >> ChangeLog is good. >> >> 2012-08-03 Jonathan Yong >> >> * Makefile.in (version): set to BASE-VER file from

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:04 AM, JonY wrote: > > OK. Btw, I don't actually have write access, so please commit if the > ChangeLog is good. > > 2012-08-03 Jonathan Yong > > * Makefile.in (version): set to BASE-VER file from gcc > directory. Committed. Thanks. Ian

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread JonY
On 8/3/2012 23:35, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:02 AM, JonY wrote: >> On 8/3/2012 22:37, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, JonY wrote: For correctness sake, determine version from BASE-VER file instead of calling compiler. This allows

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 8:02 AM, JonY wrote: > On 8/3/2012 22:37, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, JonY wrote: >>> >>> For correctness sake, determine version from BASE-VER file instead of >>> calling compiler. This allows better toleration with bad Canadian cross >>> set

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread JonY
On 8/3/2012 22:37, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, JonY wrote: >> >> For correctness sake, determine version from BASE-VER file instead of >> calling compiler. This allows better toleration with bad Canadian cross >> setups where host gcc version is of different version f

Re: [PATCH] Fix libgcc version for Canadian cross compile

2012-08-03 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:01 AM, JonY wrote: > > For correctness sake, determine version from BASE-VER file instead of > calling compiler. This allows better toleration with bad Canadian cross > setups where host gcc version is of different version from target. > > Patch OK? The patch is OK but yo