On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 17:51, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 01/10/22 17:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 11:43, François Dumont wrote:
> >> On 01/10/22 12:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 08:20, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> >>> wrote:
> I had forg
On 01/10/22 17:30, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 11:43, François Dumont wrote:
On 01/10/22 12:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 08:20, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
I had forgotten to re-run tests after I removed the #define
_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0.
The
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 11:43, François Dumont wrote:
>
> On 01/10/22 12:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 08:20, François Dumont via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> >> I had forgotten to re-run tests after I removed the #define
> >> _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0.
> >>
> >> The comment was mis
On 01/10/22 12:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 08:20, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
I had forgotten to re-run tests after I removed the #define
_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0.
The comment was misleading, it could also impact output of std::list.
I am also restoring the corre
On Sat, 1 Oct 2022 at 08:20, François Dumont via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> I had forgotten to re-run tests after I removed the #define
> _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0.
>
> The comment was misleading, it could also impact output of std::list.
>
> I am also restoring the correct std::string alias for
> std::_
I had forgotten to re-run tests after I removed the #define
_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI 0.
The comment was misleading, it could also impact output of std::list.
I am also restoring the correct std::string alias for
std::__cxx11::basic_string, even if with my workaround it doesn't really
matter as
