Hi Richard,
Yeah, the testcase is there. Sorry for my mistake.
Thank you for back-porting this patch to 4.8 & 4.9 branch.
Cheers,
Felix
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 5:30 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Felix Yang wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> I find that you
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Felix Yang wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I find that you missed the testcase with when committing the patch.
I don't think so.
> GCC 4.8 & 4.9 branch also has the same issue, may be we need to
> fix for them too?
Yeah, I'll backport it.
Thanks,
Richard.
> C
Hi Richard,
I find that you missed the testcase with when committing the patch.
GCC 4.8 & 4.9 branch also has the same issue, may be we need to
fix for them too?
Cheers,
Felix
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Felix Yang wrote:
>>
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Felix Yang wrote:
> Attached please find the patch and testcase for PR62037.
>
> DEF1 can be a GIMPLE_NOP and gimple_bb will be NULL then. The patch
> checks for that.
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-suse-linux. OK for trunk? Please commit this
> patch if it's OK.
>
Thank
