On Nov 19, 2019, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> My question to you is this: can you explain, given the following debug
> info, extracted by readelf from alias.c, why the address 0x6e11 is in
> the inlined subroutine and *not* in the get_alias_set function?
The long version of the explanation is in
http
On 11/19/19 3:01 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> Hello, Bernd,
>
> Apologies for taking so long to respond. I had not noticed your patch
> before being explicitly copied on it.
>
> IIUC you're describing a problem in GDB, that could be summed up as its
> not paying attention to is_stmt and being un
Hello, Bernd,
Apologies for taking so long to respond. I had not noticed your patch
before being explicitly copied on it.
IIUC you're describing a problem in GDB, that could be summed up as its
not paying attention to is_stmt and being unaware of location views, and
you appear to be proposing to
