On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> As suggested in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00285.html, I
> have updated the attached patch to rename 'dump_enabled_phase' to
> 'dump_enabled_phase_p'. The 'dump_enabled_p ()' doesn't take any
> argument and can be used as a predica
As suggested in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-10/msg00285.html, I
have updated the attached patch to rename 'dump_enabled_phase' to
'dump_enabled_phase_p'. The 'dump_enabled_p ()' doesn't take any
argument and can be used as a predicate for the dump calls.
Once this patch gets in, the plan is to
