Re: [PATCH] Fix c++/60272

2014-02-20 Thread Richard Henderson
On 02/20/2014 01:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 02/20/2014 12:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Richard Henderson wrote: >>> Tested on x86_64 and i686, and manually inspecting the generated code. >>> Any ideas how to regression test this? >> >> No idea a

Re: [PATCH] Fix c++/60272

2014-02-20 Thread Richard Henderson
On 02/20/2014 12:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Richard Henderson wrote: >> Tested on x86_64 and i686, and manually inspecting the generated code. >> Any ideas how to regression test this? > > No idea about how to test this. > >> @@ -5330,14 +5330,23 @@ ex

Re: [PATCH] Fix c++/60272

2014-02-20 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Richard Henderson wrote: > Tested on x86_64 and i686, and manually inspecting the generated code. > Any ideas how to regression test this? No idea about how to test this. > @@ -5330,14 +5330,23 @@ expand_builtin_atomic_compare_exchange (enum > machine_mo