On 11/15/2017 12:31 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 11/08/2017 05:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> I don't see an updated patch in this thread? THe last message I see is
>> this one where you indicate you're going to tweak the patch and re-test.
>>
>> Jeff
> Yes, I tweaked and tested following patch.
>
> M
On 11/08/2017 05:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> I don't see an updated patch in this thread? THe last message I see is
> this one where you indicate you're going to tweak the patch and re-test.
>
> Jeff
Yes, I tweaked and tested following patch.
Martin
>From a369ac78b887e219a375e17d6817c1f744e71779 M
On 11/02/2017 07:15 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> PING^1
I don't see an updated patch in this thread? THe last message I see is
this one where you indicate you're going to tweak the patch and re-test.
Jeff
>
> On 10/19/2017 01:36 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 09/20/2017 10:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrot
PING^1
On 10/19/2017 01:36 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 10:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> Following patch handles UBSAN (overflow) in dce.c.
>>
>> dse.c ;)
>>
>>> --- a/gcc/dse.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/dse.c
>>> @@
On 09/20/2017 10:15 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Following patch handles UBSAN (overflow) in dce.c.
>
> dse.c ;)
>
>> --- a/gcc/dse.c
>> +++ b/gcc/dse.c
>> @@ -929,7 +929,9 @@ set_usage_bits (group_info *group, HOST_WIDE_
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:50:32AM +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Following patch handles UBSAN (overflow) in dce.c.
dse.c ;)
> --- a/gcc/dse.c
> +++ b/gcc/dse.c
> @@ -929,7 +929,9 @@ set_usage_bits (group_info *group, HOST_WIDE_INT offset,
> HOST_WIDE_INT width,
> {
>HOST_WIDE_IN
