Jakub Jelinek wrote on 17/04/2011 05:26:14 PM:
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:30:31AM +0300, Ira Rosen wrote:
> > We already have this check in vect_build_slp_tree(). It didn't work for
the
> > testcase because it doesn't take into account the type of definition. I
> > agree that it's better to
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 11:30:31AM +0300, Ira Rosen wrote:
> We already have this check in vect_build_slp_tree(). It didn't work for the
> testcase because it doesn't take into account the type of definition. I
> agree that it's better to move it here and base the vector/scalar decision
> on it, b
Jakub Jelinek wrote on 16/04/2011 09:16:23 AM:
>
> Hi!
>
> As the attached testcase shows, while the current detection of what
> shifts are by scalar and what shifts are by vector shift count
> may work well for loop vectorizer (vect_internal_def being vector
> shift, vect_external_def or vect_c
