On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > > > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to
> > >
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > > > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to
> > > > factor
> > > > out tree.c:auto_var_in_fn_p and place the ne
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to
> > > > factor out tree.c:auto_var_in_fn_p and place the new auto_var_p in
> > > > tree.c as well.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I left the above unchanged from a different variant of t
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to factor
> > > out tree.c:auto_var_in_fn_p and place the new auto_var_p in tree.c as
> > > well.
> >
> > Hmm, I left the above
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > You miss PARM_DECLs and RESULT_DECLs, i.e. it's probably better to factor
> > out tree.c:auto_var_in_fn_p and place the new auto_var_p in tree.c as
> > well.
>
> Hmm, I left the above unchanged from a different variant of the patch
> where for
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > @@ -332,6 +337,24 @@ struct obstack final_solutions_obstack;
> > Indexed directly by variable info id. */
> > static vec varmap;
> >
> > +/* Return whether VAR is an automatic variable. *
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> @@ -332,6 +337,24 @@ struct obstack final_solutions_obstack;
> Indexed directly by variable info id. */
> static vec varmap;
>
> +/* Return whether VAR is an automatic variable. */
> +
> +static bool
> +auto_var_p (const_tree var)
> +{
> +
