Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 10:14 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch >> iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. >> Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> >> This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch >> iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. >> Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-22 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch > iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. > Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed this no longer > breaks bootstrap. > > Bootstrapped on

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR53031

2012-04-21 Thread H.J. Lu
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > This fixes PR53031 and reverts back to using the number of latch > iterations in VRP when computing ranges for induction variables. > Now after ira_allocno_object_iter_cond is fixed this no longer > breaks bootstrap. > > Bootstrapped on