On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> + /* Do not merge an extern inline decl with any other decl either. */
> + if ((DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (newdecl)
> +&& DECL_EXTERNAL (newdecl))
> + || (!flag_gnu89_inline
> + && (DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (newdecl)
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:35:08AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > But that's of course intended. Attributes or redirection on the
> > > extern inline variant are completely meaningless.
> > >
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:35:08AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > But that's of course intended. Attributes or redirection on the
> > extern inline variant are completely meaningless.
> >
> > > If you want to keep olddecl as is, then IMHO we should
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 09:35:08AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> But that's of course intended. Attributes or redirection on the
> extern inline variant are completely meaningless.
>
> > If you want to keep olddecl as is, then IMHO we should add a new bool
> > argument to merge_decls and if th
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > This fixes the ICEs that occur with redeclared extern inline functions
> > in some circumstances. It avoids the cgraph confusion by _not_ merging
> > the two decls in this case but si
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:05:36AM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> This fixes the ICEs that occur with redeclared extern inline functions
> in some circumstances. It avoids the cgraph confusion by _not_ merging
> the two decls in this case but simply drops the old (extern inline)
> one on the flo
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This fixes the ICEs that occur with redeclared extern inline functions
> in some circumstances. It avoids the cgraph confusion by _not_ merging
> the two decls in this case but simply drops the old (extern inline)
> one on the floor. This causes
