On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 12:25:08, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>>
>> this would cause an ICE in test case 2629-1.c...
>
> Well, that's easily fixable.
>
>> So removing the pointer of vectors is not an option.
>
> Let me nevertheless try this.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:38:33, Richard Biener wrote:
>> I'd rather go with the simple fix as the issue in forwprop is at least
>> latent. We can
>> improve on the code-gen as followup where I believe handling of
>> POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
>> would n
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:38:33, Richard Biener wrote:
> I'd rather go with the simple fix as the issue in forwprop is at least
> latent. We can
> improve on the code-gen as followup where I believe handling of
> POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
> would need to be added (that we avoid POINTER_PLUS_EXPR for vectors is
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:34:51 Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger
>> wrote:
>>> This patch fixes a bug in the vectorized pointer arithmetic in the forwprop
>>> optimization pass.
>>>
>>> Although it seems
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:34:51 Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger
> wrote:
>> This patch fixes a bug in the vectorized pointer arithmetic in the forwprop
>> optimization pass.
>>
>> Although it seems to be impossible to create a vector of pointers with the
>> __a
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger
wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in the vectorized pointer arithmetic in the forwprop
> optimization pass.
>
> Although it seems to be impossible to create a vector of pointers with the
> __attribute__((vector_size(x))) syntax, the vector loop optimiz
