On 03/03/2015 10:50 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
@@ -2952,9 +2959,12 @@ sem_item_optimizer::merge_classes (unsigned int
prev_class_count)
alias->dump_to_file (dump_file);
}
- source->merge (alias)
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:31:17AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> @@ -2952,9 +2959,12 @@ sem_item_optimizer::merge_classes (unsigned int
> prev_class_count)
> alias->dump_to_file (dump_file);
> }
>
> - source->merge (alias);
> + if (source->merge (alias))
On 03/02/2015 06:20 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hello.
Following one line patch is fix for PR ipa/65087. No regression has been
seen on x86_64-linux-pc.
OK, it won't happend large programs, but can you arrange its execute method to
return TODO_remove_functions only if some merging actually happened
> Hello.
>
> Following one line patch is fix for PR ipa/65087. No regression has been
> seen on x86_64-linux-pc.
OK, it won't happend large programs, but can you arrange its execute method to
return TODO_remove_functions only if some merging actually happened?
Patch is preapproved with this chang