RE: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle

2014-02-15 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Iyer, Balaji V wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 12:34 PM > > To: Richard Biener; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Cc: Iyer, Balaji V > > Subjec

RE: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle

2014-02-14 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 12:34 PM > To: Richard Biener; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Iyer, Balaji V > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle > > On 02/13/14 05:47, Richard

Re: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle

2014-02-14 Thread Jeff Law
On 02/13/14 05:47, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Richard Biener wrote: Cilk+ builds INDIRECT_REFs when expanding builtins (oops) and thus those can leak into MEM_EXRs which will lead to ICEs later. The following patch properly builds a MEM_REF instead. Grepping for INDIRECT_REF I

Re: [PATCH] Fix Cilk+ ICEs in the alias oracle

2014-02-13 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Richard Biener wrote: > > Cilk+ builds INDIRECT_REFs when expanding builtins (oops) and thus > those can leak into MEM_EXRs which will lead to ICEs later. > The following patch properly builds a MEM_REF instead. Grepping > for INDIRECT_REF I found another suspicious use (jus