On 06/23/2014 08:55 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Agreed, this is why cmpelim looks interesting for Thumb1. (We may need another
> hook or something to disable it in configurations we don't need it in, but you
> know ... )
Yeah. Feel free to change targetm.flags_regnum from a variable to a fu
On 23/06/14 15:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 06/23/2014 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
small embedded targets without an FPU.
I'm a bit surprised that Ramana d
On 06/23/2014 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>
> On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
>> small embedded targets without an FPU.
>>
>> I'm a bit surprised that Ramana decided to enable this pass for aa
On 20/06/14 21:28, Richard Henderson wrote:
There aren't too many users of the cmpelim pass, and previously they were all
small embedded targets without an FPU.
I'm a bit surprised that Ramana decided to enable this pass for aarch64, as
that target is not so limited as the block comment for th
