On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 4:55 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 12/2/21 15:22, Martin Liška wrote:
> > On 12/2/21 15:11, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> the ?:s look odd to me, the above is equivalent to v > 0 ? 1 : 0, no?
> >> Did you mean to make v > 0 v != 0?
> >
> > Yeah, it's typo, should be 'v != 0 ?
On 12/2/21 15:22, Martin Liška wrote:
On 12/2/21 15:11, Richard Biener wrote:
the ?:s look odd to me, the above is equivalent to v > 0 ? 1 : 0, no?
Did you mean to make v > 0 v != 0?
Yeah, it's typo, should be 'v != 0 ? ...'.
Martin
There's a tested patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu
On 12/2/21 15:11, Richard Biener wrote:
the ?:s look odd to me, the above is equivalent to v > 0 ? 1 : 0, no?
Did you mean to make v > 0 v != 0?
Yeah, it's typo, should be 'v != 0 ? ...'.
Martin
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:07 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 11/30/21 10:33, Richard Biener wrote:
> > and the "docs" say
> >
> >/* The switch is enabled when FLAG_VAR is nonzero. */
> >CLVC_BOOLEAN,
>
> That's bogus, because real meaning of CLVC_BOOLEAN is that it holds an
> integer value.
On 11/30/21 10:33, Richard Biener wrote:
and the "docs" say
/* The switch is enabled when FLAG_VAR is nonzero. */
CLVC_BOOLEAN,
That's bogus, because real meaning of CLVC_BOOLEAN is that it holds an integer
value.
It can be just true/false for a simple flag, can be 0,1,2 for things lik
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Martin Liška wrote:
>
> There are cases where a default option value is -1 and
> auto-detection happens in e.g. target.
>
> Do not print these options. Leads to the following diff:
>
> - -fdelete-null-pointer-checks [enabled]
> + -fdelete-null-poin
