On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:26:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > I'd fear people will use -fchecking and feel error-recovery bugs are then
> > more important because they no longer get the more user friendly message.
> > Can't we arrange for the em
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 05:26:25PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I'd fear people will use -fchecking and feel error-recovery bugs are then
> more important because they no longer get the more user friendly message.
> Can't we arrange for the emergency IL dump to happen in this case anyway?
Does it
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Currently IL verification errors trigger "confused by earlier errors"
> > messages with a release compiler but compiling with -fchecking.
> > That is because those use error() before inte
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> Currently IL verification errors trigger "confused by earlier errors"
> messages with a release compiler but compiling with -fchecking.
> That is because those use error() before internal_error.
>
> This precludes useful things like
