On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> >Or by changing get_qualified_die (in particular check_base_type) to use a
>>> >langhook, we could at least for DW_AT_{
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >Or by changing get_qualified_die (in particular check_base_type) to use a
>> >langhook, we could at least for DW_AT_{reference,rvalue_reference} just use
>> >equate_type_number
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >Or by changing get_qualified_die (in particular check_base_type) to use a
> >langhook, we could at least for DW_AT_{reference,rvalue_reference} just use
> >equate_type_number_to_die/lookup_type_die reliably (DW_AT_endianity issue
> >
On 10/24/2016 03:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:34:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
This is another addition in DWARF5. The patch emits these attributes
only for DW_TAG_subprogram for non-static ref-qualified membe
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 02:34:04PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > This is another addition in DWARF5. The patch emits these attributes
> > only for DW_TAG_subprogram for non-static ref-qualified member functions.
> > Bootstrapped/regtested
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> This is another addition in DWARF5. The patch emits these attributes
> only for DW_TAG_subprogram for non-static ref-qualified member functions.
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
> We really should
