On Jan 2, 2019, at 5:39 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> It's on the brink, I'd say. The effective-keyword form is shorter and
> more descriptive and can be extended to more targets way more easily.
> Checking 2018-12 testresults, I find failures of the ident-*.c tests on
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and p
Hi Iain,
> The c-c++-common tests fail (or XPASS depending on which) on Darwin
> because it doesn't currently emit .ident marker.
>
> For powerpc darwin (and, I think, AIX - hence copying David), there’s no
> .ident support in the assembler, and we need to skip the tests.
>
> In this case, I sugg
> On 26 Dec 2018, at 16:07, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 6:16 AM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> The c-c++-common tests fail (or XPASS depending on which) on Darwin
>> because it doesn't currently emit .ident marker.
>>
>> For powerpc darwin (and, I think, AIX - hence
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 6:16 AM Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The c-c++-common tests fail (or XPASS depending on which) on Darwin
> because it doesn't currently emit .ident marker.
>
> For powerpc darwin (and, I think, AIX - hence copying David), there’s no
> .ident support in the assembler, and w
On 12/23/18 4:16 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi
>
> The c-c++-common tests fail (or XPASS depending on which) on Darwin
> because it doesn't currently emit .ident marker.
>
> For powerpc darwin (and, I think, AIX - hence copying David), there’s no
> .ident support in the assembler, and we need to s
