> According to Eric:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53037#c32
>
> "if (mode_align >= TYPE_ALIGN (type))" was intentional. I am
> not familiar with STRICT_ALIGNMENT target and there is no
> testcase to show why it is needed.
Yes, the mode promotion triggers the alignment promot
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 10:18 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Don't override alignment specified by user with the same value to
>> preserve TYPE_USER_ALIGN. This fixes PR 53037 tests on Sparc.
>>
>> Does it look right?
>
> Doesn't match do_type_ali
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 10:18 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Don't override alignment specified by user with the same value to
> preserve TYPE_USER_ALIGN. This fixes PR 53037 tests on Sparc.
>
> Does it look right?
Doesn't match do_type_align so it introduces inconsistencies. The documentation
for TYPE_U
