Martin Liška schrieb:
On 7/29/19 3:46 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
Hi Martin.
In SVN r273662 you changed a comment in avr.c from __gnu_lto_v1 to
__gnu_lto_slim without changing the relevant code:
Yes.
/* __gnu_lto_slim is just a marker for the linker injected by toplev.c.
There is no
On 7/29/19 3:46 PM, Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
> Hi Martin.
>
> In SVN r273662 you changed a comment in avr.c from __gnu_lto_v1 to
> __gnu_lto_slim without changing the relevant code:
Yes.
>
> /* __gnu_lto_slim is just a marker for the linker injected by toplev.c.
> There is no need to tri
Hi Martin.
In SVN r273662 you changed a comment in avr.c from __gnu_lto_v1 to
__gnu_lto_slim without changing the relevant code:
/* __gnu_lto_slim is just a marker for the linker injected by toplev.c.
There is no need to trigger __do_clear_bss code for them. */
if (!STR_PREFIX_P (na
On 7/15/19 7:30 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The patch is about removal of the emission of __gnu_lto_v1.
> The symbol should not be needed any longer for GCC driver.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>
