Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/14/18 11:41 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Jeff Law wrote: > >>> I wonder if we could set up auto-(simulator)-testing for all supported >>> archs (and build testing for all supported configs) on the CF >>> (with the required scripting in contrib/ so it's easy to replicate).

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Joseph Myers
On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Jeff Law wrote: > > I wonder if we could set up auto-(simulator)-testing for all supported > > archs (and build testing for all supported configs) on the CF > > (with the required scripting in contrib/ so it's easy to replicate). I'd > > simply test only released snapshots to

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/14/18 1:20 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > One way to de

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/14/18 2:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:49 PM Jeff Law wrote: >> >> On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > One way to deal with th

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Richard Biener
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:49 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > >>> One way to deal with these problems is to create a fake simulator that

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Iain Sandoe
> On 14 Dec 2018, at 08:20, Segher Boessenkool > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-14 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:49:51AM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > >>> One way to deal with these problems is to create a fake simulat

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-13 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/12/18 10:33 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: >>> One way to deal with these problems is to create a fake simulator that >>> always returns success. That's what my tester does fo

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-12 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36:29AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > One way to deal with these problems is to create a fake simulator that > > always returns success. That's what my tester does for the embedded > > targets. That allows us to do r

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-12 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 2:37 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 12/11/18 1:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:13 PM Segher Boessenkool > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:25:31PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote: > >>> Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation la

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-11 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/11/18 1:44 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:13 PM Segher Boessenkool > wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:25:31PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote: >>> Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation last week. >>> >>> On 03/12/2018 21:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-11 Thread Richard Biener
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 9:13 PM Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:25:31PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote: > > Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation last week. > > > > On 03/12/2018 21:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > >I'd give the maintainers the last week to act if

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-10 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 06:25:31PM +, Andrew Jenner wrote: > Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation last week. > > On 03/12/2018 21:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >I'd give the maintainers the last week to act if they don't want this > >to happen and if nothing happens, commit it.

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-10 Thread Andrew Jenner
Sorry for the slow response on this, I was on vacation last week. On 03/12/2018 21:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote: I'd give the maintainers the last week to act if they don't want this to happen and if nothing happens, commit it. PR81084 lists all the reasons why it should be removed when it is totall

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-03 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 02:40:12PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > > 2018-12-03 Segher Boessenkool > > > > * contrib/config-list.mk: Remove powerpc-eabispe and powerpc-linux_spe. > > * gcc/config.gcc (Obsolete configurations): Delete powerpc*-*-*spe*. > > (Unsupported targets): Add powerpc

Re: [PATCH] Delete powerpcspe

2018-12-03 Thread Jeff Law
On 12/3/18 1:50 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > This deletes powerpcspe, which was deprecated for GCC 8. > > I'm not including the rm -r gcc/config/powerpcspe part in the patch, > see the diffstat summary for why. > > This does not change the testsuite, or libgcc for rs6000 (which still > is sh