On 12/12/2012 06:04 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>>
>> Probably not suitable for trunk because I use popen/pclose/fileno
>> which I don't know whether they are available on all host platforms.
>
> Just add a ifdef HAVE_popen or somesuch around it?
Better yet, use the pex routin
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> + fputs ("digraph \"\" { overlap=false;\n", fp);
This is "start_graph_dump (fp);"
> + fputs ("}\n", fp);
And this is "end_graph_dump (fp);"
I think it'd be good to call those functions instead of the fputs
calls. Keeps things consist
Richard Biener writes:
>
> Probably not suitable for trunk because I use popen/pclose/fileno
> which I don't know whether they are available on all host platforms.
Just add a ifdef HAVE_popen or somesuch around it?
-Andi
--
a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:11:26PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> There are several warts that need addressing for GCC 4.9. I'm aware of
> the following bugs. There may be others, if you find any please let me
> know.
Ok, in case I find something, I'll let you know.
> 1. dumping for debug_dot_c
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Well, it now uses dominators - so steven, I suppose "fancy" dumping
> > should be disabled whenever they are not already computed?
>
> Uh, it does? I tried to avoid that (I used get_loop_body_
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> Well, it now uses dominators - so steven, I suppose "fancy" dumping
> should be disabled whenever they are not already computed?
Uh, it does? I tried to avoid that (I used get_loop_body_in_bfs_order
for this reason). Do you have a test case
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
>> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
>> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change ne
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> > gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> > function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed to the now very
> good dumping code is splitting out t
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This adds the function print_graph_cfg that you can call from a
> gdb session and directly pipes a dot representation of the
> function to 'dot -Tx11'. The only change needed to the now very
> good dumping code is splitting out the actual
10 matches
Mail list logo
