Re: Re: [PATCH] DOC: Update COND_LEN document

2023-10-26 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
CC: gcc-patches; rguenther Subject: Re: [PATCH] DOC: Update COND_LEN document Juzhe-Zhong writes: > As Richard's suggested. We need to adapt doc for cond_len operations. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/md.texi: Update document. Thanks for addressing my comment. I was thinking a

Re: Re: [PATCH] DOC: Update COND_LEN document

2023-10-26 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
6 17:25 To: Juzhe-Zhong CC: gcc-patches; rguenther Subject: Re: [PATCH] DOC: Update COND_LEN document Juzhe-Zhong writes: > As Richard's suggested. We need to adapt doc for cond_len operations. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/md.texi: Update document. Thanks for addressing my comm

Re: [PATCH] DOC: Update COND_LEN document

2023-10-26 Thread Richard Sandiford
Juzhe-Zhong writes: > As Richard's suggested. We need to adapt doc for cond_len operations. > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * doc/md.texi: Update document. Thanks for addressing my comment. I was thinking about the pseudo code though. Currently it is: for (i = 0; i < ops[4] + ops[5]; i++) op0[i