thanks.
David
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> Committed documentation as r206161. Sorry about the delay.
>
> Thanks,
> Sharad
>
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>>> On
Committed documentation as r206161. Sorry about the delay.
Thanks,
Sharad
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:18:05AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 A
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>>> Found the issue. The stream was incorrectly being closed when it was
>>> stderr/stdout. So only the dump output before the first dump_finish
>>> call was being emitted to stderr. I
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> Found the issue. The stream was incorrectly being closed when it was
>> stderr/stdout. So only the dump output before the first dump_finish
>> call was being emitted to stderr. I fixed this the same way the
>> alt_dump_file was being handl
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li
>>> wrote:
Except that in this form, the dump will be e
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
>> suitable for very large applications.
>
> Yes. I did some measurements for both a fairly large source file th
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
> suitable for very large applications.
So? You asked for it and you can easily grep the output before storing it
away.
> Besides, we might also want to
> use the same
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 12:26 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
wrote:
> On 30 August 2013 23:23:16 Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinlia
On 30 August 2013 23:23:16 Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson
wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li
wrote:
>>> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large a
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Besides, we might also want to
> use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
> The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
> messages for dump files are not desirable.
In
Besides, we might also want to
use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
messages for dump files are not desirable.
>>>
>>> Interestingly, this doesn't even work. When I do
>>> -fdump-ipa-
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li
>> wrote:
>>> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
>>> suitable for very large applications.
>>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
>> suitable for very large applications.
>
> Yes. I did some measurements for both a fairly large source file t
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
> suitable for very large applications.
Yes. I did some measurements for both a fairly large source file that
is heavily optimized with LIPO and for a simple toy example
Except that in this form, the dump will be extremely large and not
suitable for very large applications. Besides, we might also want to
use the same machinery (dump_printf_loc etc) for dump file dumping.
The current behavior of using '-details' to turn on opt-info-all
messages for dump files are no
Sorry, I should not have committed that new test along with this
portion of the patch. Removed as of r202106.
Teresa
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Teresa Johnson writes:
>
>> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c
>>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
> New patch below that removes this global variable, and also outputs
> the node->symbol.order (in square brackets after the function name so
> as to not clutter it). Inli
Teresa Johnson writes:
> Index: testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c
> ===
> --- testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0)
> +++ testsuite/gcc.dg/inline-dump.c (revision 0)
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +/* Verify that -fopt-info can ou
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> The inline stuff should be split and re-sent, it's non-obvious to me (extra
>> function parameters are not documented for example). I'd rather have
>> inline_and_report_call () for example instead of an extra bool parameter.
>> But let's i
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
New patch below that removes this global variable, and also outputs
the node->symbol.order (in square brackets after the function name so
as to not clutter it). Inline messages with profile data look look:
test.c:8:3:
Ok.
Richard.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Joh
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 3:05 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
Does
'make newlines consitent' avoid all the spurious vertical spacing I see
with
-fopt-info?
>>>
>>> Well, it helps get us there. The problem was that before, since
>>> dump_loc was not consistently emitting newlines, the
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson
wrote
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson
wr
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> H
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> H
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> H
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Jo
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor
+ Honza
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Ping #3.
>
> Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> Ping.
>> Thanks,
>> Teresa
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa John
Ping #3.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> Ping.
> Thanks,
> Teresa
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue
Ping.
Thanks,
Teresa
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:1
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambo
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>>> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teres
yes -- if this is the place developers look at the most.
David
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 09:22:02AM -0700, Sharad Singhai wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> >>> This patch ports messages to
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> >> This patch ports messages to the new du
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>>> This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
>>
>> It would be great this new framework was docu
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:14:42AM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> >> This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
> >
> > It would be great this new framework was
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
>
> It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
> track of what was agreed it would be a
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
>> This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
>
> It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
> track of what was agreed it would be a
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:37:00PM -0700, Teresa Johnson wrote:
> This patch ports messages to the new dump framework,
It would be great this new framework was documented somewhere. I lost
track of what was agreed it would be and from the uses in the
vectorizer I was never quite sure how to
44 matches
Mail list logo
