On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:37:32PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I think it is just fine for 5 branch too.
Ok, committed there as well.
> You could even use int tem3 = ~m; and use tem3 instead of ~m if you really
> wanted to test whether GIMPLE folding works.
Sure.
Marek
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 12:30:24PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > In the process of dealing with PR68513, it turned out this test should have
> > been written with GIMPLE in mind.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? Maybe we'll
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> In the process of dealing with PR68513, it turned out this test should have
> been written with GIMPLE in mind.
>
> Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk? Maybe we'll want this even for 5, I
> don't know yet.
Ok.
Richard.
> 2015-11-27 Ma
