Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-05-07 Thread Chung-Ju Wu
2014-05-02 14:41 GMT+08:00 Kito Cheng : > Hi Jeff: > >> I fixed up some minor whitespace issues and committed your patch. > > Thanks for your help :) Hi, I noticed the commit date in ChangeLog was incorrect for the patch. Fixed it as obvious. Committed into Rev.210138. Index: gcc/ChangeLog

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-05-01 Thread Kito Cheng
Hi Jeff: > I fixed up some minor whitespace issues and committed your patch. Thanks for your help :)

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-05-01 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/16/14 06:14, Kito Cheng wrote: Hi Vladimir: thanks your replay and approve, however I don't have commit right yet, can you help to commit it? thanks! I fixed up some minor whitespace issues and committed your patch. Jeff

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-04-16 Thread Kito Cheng
Hi Vladimir: thanks your replay and approve, however I don't have commit right yet, can you help to commit it? thanks! On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > On 2014-04-15, 9:26 AM, Kito Cheng wrote: >> >> Hi Vladimir: >> >>> Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wai

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-04-16 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 2014-04-15, 9:26 AM, Kito Cheng wrote: Hi Vladimir: Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wait for stage 1 as right now we don't need this functionality. The patch is ok for the stage1 which is probably about a month away. ping is this patch ok now? Yes, I approved it alread

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-04-15 Thread Kito Cheng
Hi Vladimir: > Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wait for stage 1 as right now > we don't need this functionality. > > The patch is ok for the stage1 which is probably about a month away. ping is this patch ok now? thanks:) > Thanks for the patch.

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-03-06 Thread Kito Cheng
> Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wait for stage 1 as right now > we don't need this functionality. > > The patch is ok for the stage1 which is probably about a month away. > > Thanks for the patch. Got it, thanks for your review :) > > >> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Kito Che

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-03-05 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 3/4/2014, 9:59 AM, Kito Cheng wrote: Ping. Although this patch is safe. I guess it could wait for stage 1 as right now we don't need this functionality. The patch is ok for the stage1 which is probably about a month away. Thanks for the patch. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Kito

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-03-04 Thread Kito Cheng
Ping. On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Kito Cheng wrote: > Hi all: > > Sorry for repeat patch content in last mail, here is the clean version > for this patch. > > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h > index 7ca47a7..1638332 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h > +++ b/gcc/co

Re: [PATCH] Change HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER to a marco for C expression

2014-02-26 Thread Kito Cheng
Hi all: Sorry for repeat patch content in last mail, here is the clean version for this patch. diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h index 7ca47a7..1638332 100644 --- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.h +++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.h @@ -1152,7 +1152,7 @@ extern int arm_regs_in_sequence[]; /*