Re: [PATCH] C++ API database

2022-10-18 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 01:01:14PM +0200, Ulrich Drepper via Gcc-patches wrote: > This is of course not a new problem in general. GNU make has for a long > time support for order-only prerequisites. With those one can exactly > express what is needed: > > ifeq ($(ENABLE_MAINTAINER_RULES), true)

Re: [PATCH] C++ API database

2022-10-18 Thread Martin Liška
On 10/18/22 13:01, Ulrich Drepper via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:56 AM Jason Merrill wrote: > >> That makes sense; the file could say something to that effect. > > > I did that. > > > >> Or the >> CSV file could live in the library directory, or a third directory. > >

Re: [PATCH] C++ API database

2022-10-18 Thread Ulrich Drepper via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:56 AM Jason Merrill wrote: > That makes sense; the file could say something to that effect. I did that. > Or the > CSV file could live in the library directory, or a third directory. The reasoning is that with the file living in the cp subdir we don't have the s

Re: [PATCH] C++ API database

2022-10-17 Thread Jason Merrill via Gcc-patches
On 9/28/22 12:59, Ulrich Drepper via Gcc-patches wrote: Ping. Anyone having problems with this? And the governance of the file? Hmm, for some reason this didn't show up on my C++ patches filter. Please do CC me when pinging C++ patches. On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 1:51 PM Ulrich Drepper wrot

Re: [PATCH] C++ API database

2022-09-28 Thread Ulrich Drepper via Gcc-patches
Ping. Anyone having problems with this? And the governance of the file? On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 1:51 PM Ulrich Drepper wrote: > After my prior inquiry into the use of python as a build tool for > maintainers didn't produce any negative comments and several active and > even enthusiastic suppor