Re: [PATCH] C++: Fix PR86083

2018-07-08 Thread Jason Merrill
On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > On 06/20/2018 01:41 PM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: >> When turning a user-defined numerical literal into an operator >> invocation the literal needs to be translated to the execution >> character set. >> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x. x

Re: [PATCH] C++: Fix PR86083

2018-07-06 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 06/20/2018 01:41 PM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > When turning a user-defined numerical literal into an operator > invocation the literal needs to be translated to the execution > character set. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x. x86_64 still running. > Ok to apply if x86_64 is clean? > > By

Re: [PATCH] C++: Fix PR86083

2018-06-26 Thread Andreas Krebbel
On 06/26/2018 11:17 AM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Andreas, > >> When turning a user-defined numerical literal into an operator >> invocation the literal needs to be translated to the execution >> character set. >> >> Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x. x86_64 still running. >> Ok to apply if x86_64

Re: [PATCH] C++: Fix PR86083

2018-06-26 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Andreas, > When turning a user-defined numerical literal into an operator > invocation the literal needs to be translated to the execution > character set. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x. x86_64 still running. > Ok to apply if x86_64 is clean? the new testcase FAILs on Solaris FAIL:

Re: [PATCH] C++: Fix PR86083

2018-06-20 Thread Jason Merrill
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:41 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote: > When turning a user-defined numerical literal into an operator > invocation the literal needs to be translated to the execution > character set. > > Bootstrapped and regtested on s390x. x86_64 still running. > Ok to apply if x86_64 is clean