Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-10-02 Thread Mark Eggleston
Thanks, as you point out all the test needs to do is verify that that a variable with an AUTOMATIC attribute can be used in an EQUIVALENCE and and that the items in the EQUIVALENCE are on the stack by using in a recursive routine. I've created a patch to replace the existing test cases and hav

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-09-30 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 10:33:26PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Aug 14 2019, Mark Eggleston wrote: > > >     * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_3.f90: New test. > > This test fails everywhere. Yes, and _2 on i686-linux at -O0. To me both testcases are undefined behavior. E.g. the first one has:

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-09-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Aug 14 2019, Mark Eggleston wrote: >     * gfortran.dg/auto_in_equiv_3.f90: New test. This test fails everywhere. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-08-16 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 14/08/2019 18:10, Jeff Law wrote: On 8/14/19 2:45 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote: I now have commit access. gcc/fortran     Jeff Law     Mark Eggleston     * gfortran.h: Add gfc_check_conflict declaration.     * symbol.c (check_conflict): Rename cfg_check_conflict and remove     static.

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-08-14 Thread Jeff Law
On 8/14/19 2:45 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote: > I now have commit access. > > gcc/fortran > >     Jeff Law >     Mark Eggleston > >     * gfortran.h: Add gfc_check_conflict declaration. >     * symbol.c (check_conflict): Rename cfg_check_conflict and remove >     static. >     * symbol.c (cfg_chec

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-08-14 Thread Mark Eggleston
I now have commit access. gcc/fortran     Jeff Law     Mark Eggleston     * gfortran.h: Add gfc_check_conflict declaration.     * symbol.c (check_conflict): Rename cfg_check_conflict and remove     static.     * symbol.c (cfg_check_conflict): Remove automatic in equivalence     conflict check

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-07-22 Thread Jeff Law
On 7/1/19 3:35 AM, Mark Eggleston wrote: > > On 25/06/2019 14:17, Mark Eggleston wrote: >> >> On 25/06/2019 00:17, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM

Re: **ping** Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-07-10 Thread Mark Eggleston
Apologies typo in ChangeLog. On 08/07/2019 14:51, Mark Eggleston wrote: **ping** On 01/07/2019 10:35, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 25/06/2019 14:17, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 25/06/2019 00:17, Jeff Law wrote: On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -070

**ping** Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-07-08 Thread Mark Eggleston
**ping** On 01/07/2019 10:35, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 25/06/2019 14:17, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 25/06/2019 00:17, Jeff Law wrote: On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Egg

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-07-01 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 25/06/2019 14:17, Mark Eggleston wrote: On 25/06/2019 00:17, Jeff Law wrote: On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-06-25 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 25/06/2019 00:17, Jeff Law wrote: On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC attribute can not appear in an EQUIVALENCE s

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-06-24 Thread Jeff Law
On 6/24/19 2:19 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 > Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: >>> Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC attribute can not appear in an >>> EQUIVALENCE statement. However its coun

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-06-24 Thread Mark Eggleston
On 24/06/2019 09:19, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC attribute can not appear in an EQUIVALENCE statement. However its counterpart, ST

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-06-24 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:10:11 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: > > Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC attribute can not appear in an > > EQUIVALENCE statement. However its counterpart, STATIC, can be used in > > an EQUIVALENCE stateme

Re: [PATCH] Automatics in equivalence statements

2019-06-21 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:31:51PM +0100, Mark Eggleston wrote: > Currently variables with the AUTOMATIC attribute can not appear in an > EQUIVALENCE statement. However its counterpart, STATIC, can be used in > an EQUIVALENCE statement. > > Where there is a clear conflict in the attributes of va