On 12/21/2017 02:13 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 12/20/2017 06:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Another thing is that the "/" in there is wrong, so
const char dir_separator_str[] = { DIR_SEPARATOR, '\0' };
char *b = concat (profile_data_prefix, dir_separator_str, pwd, NULL);
needs to be used instea
On 12/20/2017 06:45 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Another thing is that the "/" in there is wrong, so
> const char dir_separator_str[] = { DIR_SEPARATOR, '\0' };
> char *b = concat (profile_data_prefix, dir_separator_str, pwd, NULL);
> needs to be used instead.
This looks much nicer, I forgot abo
On 12/20/2017 10:45 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:35:44AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 10/27/2017 07:17 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
It's improvement that I consider still useful even though we're not
going to use
it for profiled bootstrap.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc6
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:35:44AM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/27/2017 07:17 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > It's improvement that I consider still useful even though we're not
> > going to use
> > it for profiled bootstrap.
> >
> > Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux an
On 10/27/2017 07:17 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
It's improvement that I consider still useful even though we're not
going to use
it for profiled bootstrap.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
For what it's worth, although it looks correct as is, I thi
PING^1
On 10/27/2017 03:17 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hello.
>
> It's improvement that I consider still useful even though we're not going to
> use
> it for profiled bootstrap.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready for trunk?
> Thanks,
> Martin
