On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 21:04 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
>
> Here is the latest patch after fixing all the nit picks and issues
> pointed out by everyone.
>
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Dave
Here is the latest patch after fixing all the nit picks and issues pointed out
by everyone.
call_string.patch
Description: Binary data
Thanks you
- Ankur
> On 25-Jul-2021, at 7:59 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>
> !(*this == other)
Thanks for the suggestion.
Here is the updated patch.
Thank you
- Ankur
On Sun, 25 Jul 2021 at 16:03, Ankur Saini via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Here is the new patch after fixing all the issues pointed out in the previous
> version.
Just a nitpick:
+/* call_string::element_t's inequality operator. */
+bool
+call_string::element_t::operator!= (const call_string::elemen
Here is the new patch after fixing all the issues pointed out in the previous
version.
call_string.patch
Description: Binary data
—
Question :
1. The mail id I am using here to send the patch ( arsenic.second...@gmail.com
) and the mail id in the patch ( arse...@sourceware.org ) are differ
On Sat, 2021-07-24 at 15:22 +0530, Ankur Saini wrote:
> The patch generalises how analyzer's call_string tracks function calls,
> including the calls that doesn’t have an underlying call graph edge,
> making it possible to work with function calls which are not discovered
> by GCC's middle end.
>
