On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Richard,
> >> Does this have to wait for stage 1? Or I will try to work out a full
> >> patch with loop recreating issue fixed.
> >
> > If it is a
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Bin.Cheng wrote:
>
>> Hi Richard,
>> Does this have to wait for stage 1? Or I will try to work out a full
>> patch with loop recreating issue fixed.
>
> If it is a regression and there is a bugzilla about it it doesn't
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014, Bin.Cheng wrote:
> Hi Richard,
> Does this have to wait for stage 1? Or I will try to work out a full
> patch with loop recreating issue fixed.
If it is a regression and there is a bugzilla about it it doesn't
have to wait.
The patch should be complete (but is untested yet)
Hi Richard,
Does this have to wait for stage 1? Or I will try to work out a full
patch with loop recreating issue fixed.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This allows cfgcleanup to remove some of the extra CFG that exists
> just for loop analysis passes convenience (those
