On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>>> Can you please investigate, what is wrong with all_ones_operand so it
>>> doesn't accept all (-1) operands?
>>
>> Does following work:
>>
>> ;; Return true if operand is a (vector) constant with all bits set.
>> (define_predicate "all_
Uros Bizjak writes:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_c
Hello!
Attached patch is what I have committed to handle immediates with all
bits set as standard SSE constants.
2016-04-24 Uros Bizjak
H.J. Lu
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (standard_sse_constant_p): Add
machine_mode argument.
* config/i386/i386.c (standard_sse_constant_p
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:20 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 8:20 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is the upd
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
yo
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:19 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
>>> your SSE/AVX pattern change. I didn't include your
>>> standa
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:50 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
your S
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
>>> your SSE/AVX pattern change. I didn't include your
>>> standa
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
>> your SSE/AVX pattern change. I didn't include your
>> standard_sse_constant_opcode since it didn't compile nor is ne
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:58 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Here is the updated patch with my standard_sse_constant_p change and
> your SSE/AVX pattern change. I didn't include your
> standard_sse_constant_opcode since it didn't compile nor is needed
> for this purpose.
H.J.,
please test the attached p
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
> I tried and it doesn't work since the correct mode may not be always
> available in predicates. Yes, they pass mode. But they ju
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
I tried and it doesn't work since the correct mode may not be always
available in predicates. Yes, they pass mode. But they just do
mode = GET_MODE (op);
which r
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:50 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> I tried and it doesn't work since the correct mode may not be always
>>> available in predicates. Yes, they pass mode. But they just do
>>>
>>> mode = GET_MODE (op);
>>>
>>> which returns VOIDmode for -1.
>>
>> Well, looking at generated gcc/i
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 a
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> We know, that const_
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:48 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
> We know, that const_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_SSE2 and that
> cons
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:43 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
We know, that const_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_SSE2 and that
const_wide_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_AVX2. Probably we don
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>>> We know, that const_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_SSE2 and that
>>> const_wide_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_AVX2. Probably we don't
>>> have to check AVX512F in standard_sse_constant_p
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> We know, that const_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_SSE2 and that
>> const_wide_int (-1) is allowed with TARGET_AVX2. Probably we don't
>> have to check AVX512F in standard_sse_constant_p, as it implies
>> TARGET_AVX2.
>>
>> As said, it is the jo
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 20
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:54 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since all 1s in TImode
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
Since all 1s in TImode is standard SSE2 constants, all 1s in OImode is
s
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> Since all 1s in TImode is standard SSE2 constants, all 1s in OImode is
>>> standard AVX2 constants and all 1s in XImode is standard AVX
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:37 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Since all 1s in TImode is standard SSE2 constants, all 1s in OImode is
>> standard AVX2 constants and all 1s in XImode is standard AVX512F constants,
>> pass mode to standard_sse_constant_p an
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:53 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Since all 1s in TImode is standard SSE2 constants, all 1s in OImode is
> standard AVX2 constants and all 1s in XImode is standard AVX512F constants,
> pass mode to standard_sse_constant_p and standard_sse_constant_opcode
> to check if all 1s is ava
27 matches
Mail list logo
