On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 09:43 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>
>> I think he asked for trivial forward threads though due to repeated
>> tests.
>> I hacked FRE to do this (I think), but maybe some trivial cleanup
>> opportunities
>> are sti
On 10/14/2015 09:43 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I think he asked for trivial forward threads though due to repeated
tests.
I hacked FRE to do this (I think), but maybe some trivial cleanup
opportunities
are still left here. Honza?
Well, unthreaded jumps quite confuse profile prediction and create p
> >>> I think he asked for trivial forward threads though due to repeated
> >>> tests.
> >>> I hacked FRE to do this (I think), but maybe some trivial cleanup
> >>> opportunities
> >>> are still left here. Honza?
Well, unthreaded jumps quite confuse profile prediction and create profiles
that we
On 10/14/2015 06:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
This or other related patches in the range r228731:228774 has caused a
quite
big jump in SPEC CPU 2000 binary sizes (notably 176.gcc - so maybe
affecting
bootstrap as well, at -O3). Are you sure this doesn't re-introduce DOM
effectively peeling all l
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 04:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
One of the cases that was missing in the FSM support is threadi
On 10/14/2015 04:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
One of the cases that was missing in the FSM support is threading when the
path is a single block. ie, a control statement's output can be st
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> One of the cases that was missing in the FSM support is threading when the
>> path is a single block. ie, a control statement's output can be statically
>> determined just by looking a
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> One of the cases that was missing in the FSM support is threading when the
> path is a single block. ie, a control statement's output can be statically
> determined just by looking at PHIs in the control statement's block for one
> or incoming
