On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 20:52 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> I'll throw it on x86 testing and will commit it. What branches are
> affected? Can you open a bugreport?
>
> I'll try to add a runtime testcase as well if you don't beat me to
> that. On x86 it likely requires -fschedule-insns to tri
On April 26, 2017 8:03:44 PM GMT+02:00, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 11:33 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >
>> > Index: gcc/emit-rtl.c
>> > ===
>> > --- gcc/emit-rtl.c (revision 247273)
>> > +++ gcc/emit-rtl.c
On Wed, 2017-04-26 at 11:33 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Index: gcc/emit-rtl.c
> > ===
> > --- gcc/emit-rtl.c (revision 247273)
> > +++ gcc/emit-rtl.c (working copy)
> > @@ -1954,7 +1954,10 @@ set_mem_attributes_minu
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>> This patch changes get_ref_base_and_extent to treat zero sized arrays
>> like C99 flexible arrays and assume that references to zero sized
>> arrays can also be made beyond the 'end'
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> This patch changes get_ref_base_and_extent to treat zero sized arrays
> like C99 flexible arrays and assume that references to zero sized
> arrays can also be made beyond the 'end' of the array. C99 flexible
> arrays are recognized by not ha
