On 05/12/2017 10:29 AM, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
Alexander Monakov wrote:
As I understand, we need to ensure that get_insns call retrieves the topmost
sequence corresponding to the function body, not any current subsequence that
could have been started via start_sequence. Therefore the 'prolog or
On 05/12/2017 07:30 AM, Alexander Monakov wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
This is a followup from:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02916.html
Add an assert to leaf_function_p to ensure it is not called from a
prolog or epilog sequence (which would incorrectly r
Alexander Monakov wrote:
> As I understand, we need to ensure that get_insns call retrieves the topmost
> sequence corresponding to the function body, not any current subsequence that
> could have been started via start_sequence. Therefore the 'prolog or epilog'
> part is a bit misleading, we coul
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Wilco Dijkstra wrote:
> This is a followup from:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02916.html
>
> Add an assert to leaf_function_p to ensure it is not called from a
> prolog or epilog sequence (which would incorrectly return true in a
> non-leaf function).
As
